Archive for January, 2010
|Nuclear Fusion
Saturday, January 30th, 2010
Here’s an exciting news article I found on the BBC website. Basically, there’s been a breakthrough bringing us one step closer to Nuclear Fusion power plants… maybe. The breakthrough involves the process of starting the Nuclear Fusion Reaction with lasers. In the past, it was thought to be a very uneconomical process requiring almost as much energy, or more, to begin the reaction as the reaction would produce. This breakthrough however demonstrates that this is not the case, and puts High Power Energy Lasers in the running for the first commercial nuclear fusion power plant.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8485669.stm
Some info on Nuclear Fusion
In it’s basics, nuclear fusion is a process where atoms are combined to produce new elements and hopefully energy. The most favoured of these reactions for nuclear fusion power generation is the deuterium and tritium reaction. Both deuterium (D) and tritium (T) are isotopes of Hydrogen, meaning that they have additional Neutrons for a total of 2 in D and 3 T. This reaction produces Helium, one neutron and lots of energy. I say it’s the most favoured because it produces the greatest amount of net energy of any fusion reactions. Net energy being the difference between the energy given off by the reaction and the energy required to start the reaction. Net energy is how much energy is available for electric power production.
D + T → He + 1n + 17.6 MeV
How do these lasers fit into the grand scheme of things?
As mentioned above, lasers are just one of the methods being investigated to start the nuclear fusion reaction. Another popular method is to apply a current to the reactants while being held in a plasma state. The plasma is contained by tokamak (magnetic confinement fusion). Already, there is a demonstration plant being built to test this technology, and bring it to a level of understanding where a commercial plant can be produced. This project called ITER is being built in France and is expected to switch on in 2018.
This laser technology does have some advantages to the magnetic confinement fusion method employed by ITER. Namely:
- The reactor core is mostly exposed, as apposed to being wrapped in a huge magnet
- making energy removal and maintenance easier
- allowing the use of low-activation materials in construction such as carbon fibre which would reduce the rate of irradiation to the core.
Is the Nuclear Fusion good or bad?
Hard to say. It does have several advantages over nuclear fission, which is the reaction used today in nuclear plants. For instance:
- Abundant fuel
- Reaction conditions are so temperamental that a runaway or meltdown situation is not possible, so it is considered intrinsically safe as any problems will just cause the reaction to stop
- No CO2 is produced
- Radioactive materials are mostly constrained to the reactor core itself, with expectations that it would be dangerously radioactive for about 50 years, and lightly radioactive for another 100 making storage and disposal simple when compared to todays radioactive fission waste which can require storage for thousands of years.
- Substantial source of energy capable of replacing all current carbon based electricity for the next 150 billion years based on availability of reactants.
Of course there are some draw backs as well:
- Tritium is bread from liquid Lithium, both of which are radioactive. During normal operation some Tritium will be released into the atmosphere, and a a leak could result in the release of dangerous amounts of Lithium into the atmosphere.
- Helium is also released, while it is not currently known to impact living organisms, or to act as a green house gas, increasing concentrations of anything in the atmosphere could pose unseen risks.
That’s basically all I know about nuclear fusion, hope you enjoyed.
Tags: news, science
Posted in science | No Comments »
2009 Grey Cup Video
Sunday, January 24th, 2010
I just had to pass this on when I saw it. I didn’t make it, just found it on Youtube. If you’re Canadian and you watched the CFL Grey Cup Game in 2009, you’ll get it.
Tags: humour
Posted in humour | No Comments »
Canada will give 80 million to Haiti. How?
Wednesday, January 20th, 2010
Canada has just announced that it will send $80 million to Haiti to help with humanitarian relief. I think that’s great, but isn’t Canada’s parliament prorogued? Oh yes, it is. I’m hoping that the government had previously allocated this money towards international disaster relief in it’s 2009 budget, otherwise the implications are that Canada has a new dictatorship government. A government that no longer consults the elected house of commons, but simply suspends government and makes decisions unilaterally. No wonder people are getting fed up with our parliamentary system.
Anyways, we still have to ask, was this an already budgeted item or not? I spent a few minutes searching the website for the latest budget, and could not find anything that would suggest it was. But, I could have missed it, so I sent an email to the finance department asking if it had been budgeted or not. I’ll report back with any response I receive.
I did not receive any response from the finance department…
so I wrote the opposition MP in responsible for critiquing the budget, Mr. Ralph Goodale. Here was his response:
Dear Mr. Lenzen:
Thank you for your email regarding aid to Haiti.
With respect to your questions, it all depends on how much the Government spends.
CIDA would already have some money approved by parliament (through the budget) which can be allocated, and/or reallocated to provide aid to Haiti relief efforts. Re-allocating money and spending within the existing budget would not require parliamentary approval, only Treasury board (a cabinet committee) approval.
That said, the government has promised matching funds to the donations made in Canada, so if that exceeds the amount they can find through re-allocated CIDA funds, then the government can still commit these funds, but Parliament will have to approve this money before it can actually be spent. Parliament would approve them through a vote on the Estimates (which Parliament votes on 3 times a year – the next vote (on Supplementary Estimates) will be sometime before March 26.
Sincerely,
Robyn Sullivan
Special Assistant
Office of the Hon. Ralph Goodale, P.C., M.P.
Wascana
So, I guess it is possible that the Conservative government can allocate some funds to Haiti, however once their budget is reached, it will be up to parliament to approve any further spending which is done on a scheduled basis and was not interrupted by prorogation. So, to sum it up, this is not proof of a dictatorship.
Haiti relief article.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/01/19/haiti-canada.html
Prorogation of Parliament article.
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2009/12/30/parliament-prorogation-harper.html
2009 Budget Website
Tags: charity, news, politics
Posted in charity | No Comments »
Canada Red Cross On-line Donation Overwhelmed
Tuesday, January 19th, 2010
If you are like me, the recent news coming from Haiti about the devastation caused by the January 12th, 2010 earthquake prompted you make a donation to the aid agency you thought would be most effective. I’m not going to tell you which aid agency that should have been, but I am going to share my experience with my online donation to the Canadian Red Cross.
January 13th, 2010
I logged on to the Canadian Red Cross website. I went to the “Donate On-line” section of the website. There I filled out my donation amount, name, address, and credit card details and finally pressed Submit at the bottom of the website. The Submit button turns gray. I wait. I wait some more, nothing.
Personally I’m a big fan of running Firefox from my Linux distribution of choice (currently Arch Linux). Could this be the problem? Some incompatibility? Maybe, so I load up Virtual Box drop into Windows XP and Internet Explorer. A few moments later, I’m staring at the same grayed out Submit button. Oh well, their server’s must be overloaded. I’ll try again latter.
January 14th, 2010
Wait patently for any emails which would indicate that my previous day’s attempts to make a donation were successful. None arrive.
January 15th, 2010
I try again. Good old firefox and linux come through this time. Everything processes quickly, I sleep soundly knowing I’ve done my good deed for the day.
January 18th, 2010
Checked the Visa statement. Oh oh, two charges from January 13th. Guess they went through. Realizing that I can’t afford to make a donation triple in size to what I intended I quickly email the Red Cross. Good news for me, and anyone else who made the same mistake, I received this reply by email.
Hello,
Due to an outpouring of generosity, our online donation system is running slower than normal, but we wish to assure you that your donations are being securely received.
Canadians who did not receive a confirmation of their donation can rest assured that their donations have been received. Donor tax receipts should be ready by January 29. Donors who made multiple donations due to the white screen will be contacted by the Red Cross. We are working on refunding multiple donations.
Moral of the story, if your wanting to make a donation to the Canadian Red Cross, try once, and wait a few days to check your visa statement before trying again. You won’t be receiving an email confirmation for a while, so your VISA statement will be the quickest indicator of the transaction’s success if like me, you are left with an unresponsive gray Submit box.
I’ll post an update latter on to let everyone know how I made out, but right now I’m feeling optimistic.
Update January 30th, 2010
I’m glad to report the Red Cross was true to their word. They phoned me back this afternoon and asked if the triple donation was in error. I said that it was, and they kindly refunded the difference and issued a tax receipt to my email address. No problems.
Tags: charity
Posted in charity | No Comments »